hypothesis testing
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- North America > Canada > British Columbia > Metro Vancouver Regional District > Vancouver (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England (0.04)
- North America > United States > Georgia > Fulton County > Atlanta (0.05)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
- Europe > Switzerland > Zürich > Zürich (0.04)
- Research Report > New Finding (0.88)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (0.67)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- North America > United States > Texas (0.04)
- North America > United States > Tennessee (0.04)
- (5 more...)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Uncertainty > Bayesian Inference (0.46)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Learning Graphical Models > Directed Networks > Bayesian Learning (0.46)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Statistical Learning > Regression (0.32)
Near-Optimal Private Tests for Simple and MLR Hypotheses
Chen, Yu-Wei, Pasupathy, Raghu, Awan, Jordan
We develop a near-optimal testing procedure under the framework of Gaussian differential privacy for simple as well as one- and two-sided tests under monotone likelihood ratio conditions. Our mechanism is based on a private mean estimator with data-driven clamping bounds, whose population risk matches the private minimax rate up to logarithmic factors. Using this estimator, we construct private test statistics that achieve the same asymptotic relative efficiency as the non-private, most powerful tests while maintaining conservative type I error control. In addition to our theoretical results, our numerical experiments show that our private tests outperform competing DP methods and offer comparable power to the non-private most powerful tests, even at moderately small sample sizes and privacy loss budgets.
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- North America > United States > Indiana > Tippecanoe County > West Lafayette (0.04)
- North America > United States > Indiana > Tippecanoe County > Lafayette (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Health & Medicine (0.93)
- Information Technology > Security & Privacy (0.67)
Hypothesis Testing for Differentially Private Linear Regression
The majority of our hypothesis tests are based on differentially private versions of the $F$-statistic for the general linear model framework, which are uniformly most powerful unbiased in the non-private setting. We also present another test for testing mixtures, based on the differentially private nonparametric tests of Couch, Kazan, Shi, Bray, and Groce (CCS 2019), which is especially suited for the small dataset regime. We show that the differentially private $F$-statistic converges to the asymptotic distribution of its non-private counterpart.
- Europe > Netherlands > North Brabant > Eindhoven (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Los Angeles County > Long Beach (0.04)
- Europe > France (0.04)
- North America > United States > Georgia > Fulton County > Atlanta (0.05)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.04)